Islamic Colonialism

The Ultimate Civilizational Crime

(The Truth They Never Taught You)

For 1,400 years, the world has been fed a lie:
That Islam “spread peacefully,” “enriched civilizations,” and “brought justice” wherever it went.

The truth is much darker.

Islam wasn’t a religion that simply spread through "dawah" (invitation).
It was a colonial empire — by blood, by sword, and by terror — that erased ancient civilizations, enslaved nations, and rewrote entire histories to hide its crimes.

Let’s walk through it.

🔥 First Wave of Destruction:

Erasing the Indigenous Middle East and North Africa

  • The Berbers — Indigenous North Africans who resisted fiercely — were slaughtered, forced to convert, and Arabized into forgetting their own identity.

  • The Copts — The original Egyptians — were crushed under Islamic apartheid, taxed, humiliated, and slowly bled out of existence.

  • The Assyrians — The heirs of the first great Mesopotamian civilizations — were turned into a marginalized, near-extinct minority under relentless Islamic rule.

Where are these civilizations today?
Buried under the rubble of the Arab-Islamic empire.

🔥 Second Wave:

Colonizing Persia, Anatolia, and Beyond

  • The Persians — proud heirs of Cyrus and Darius — were conquered, their Zoroastrian faith nearly wiped out, their culture Arabized, their language infected with Arabic terms.

  • The Anatolians — Greeks, Romans, Armenians — were slaughtered or forced into Islam after centuries of resistance, culminating in the fall of Constantinople.

  • The Nubians — African Christian kingdoms like Makuria and Alodia — were battered into extinction under relentless Islamic pressure.

The Islamic empire didn’t respect civilizations.
It destroyed them.

🔥 Third Wave:

Unleashing Bloodbaths in India and Eastern Europe

  • The Hindus of India suffered some of the bloodiest massacres in world history — up to 80 million dead during centuries of jihadist invasions.

  • The Balkans endured forced conversions, brutal taxes, and even the horror of the devshirme — Christian boys stolen from their families and Islamized as janissary soldiers.

Islamic colonialism didn’t just enslave bodies. It colonized minds, languages, histories, and souls.

📜 The Pattern Was Always the Same:

✅ Conquer by war and terror.
✅ Impose Islam as supreme religion.
✅ Erase local languages, replacing them with Arabic or Islamized hybrids.
✅ Wipe out native religions through forced conversions and systemic humiliation.
✅ Rebrand entire peoples as "Muslim Arabs" — even if they had nothing Arab about them.

This wasn’t “spiritual growth.” It was cultural genocide.

🤯 And Unlike European Colonialism...

European colonialism (as brutal as it was) has been widely criticized, condemned, and reversed over the last few centuries.

Islamic colonialism?
It still reigns.

  • Egypt still falsely calls itself "Arab."

  • Iran still struggles under an Arabized religious system.

  • North Africa, once Amazigh and Christian, still wears the mask of Islam.

Islamic colonialism didn’t fail. It succeeded. And it keeps succeeding because the world refuses to even name it.

🚨 The Greatest Lie Ever Told:

Islam didn’t “bring light.”
It brought darkness.
It didn’t "liberate."
It colonized.
It didn’t "preserve civilizations."
It buried them in silence.

Islamic conquest was not a golden age.
It was the ultimate civilizational crime — the slow-motion annihilation of countless native peoples.

And until we speak the truth, the victims will stay buried under 1,400 years of lies.

⚡ Final Message:

If you care about real indigenous history,
If you care about real justice,
If you care about real freedom —
You must confront the brutal truth of Islamic colonialism.

No more lies.
No more silence.

No more excuses. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Problematic Elevation of Hadith Over the Qur’an: A Critical Polemic Response to “Why Do Islamic Scholars Sometimes Prioritize Hadith Over Qur’anic Verses?” Introduction: The Qur’an or the Hadith — Which Truly Commands Authority? Islamic scholarship claims the Qur’an is the ultimate, unaltered word of God. Yet, the very same scholars often insist that hadith—the human-recorded sayings and actions of Muhammad—sometimes override or clarify the Qur’an itself. This contradictory stance raises serious questions about textual integrity, theological consistency, and the real source of Islamic law and morality. If the Qur’an is “the Book about which there is no doubt” (Qur’an 2:2), why do we find thousands of rulings and laws being sourced primarily from hadith, often at the expense of clear Qur’anic principles? This post critically examines the logic, consequences, and hidden assumptions behind this practice. 1. The Qur’an’s Primacy Is Undermined by Overreliance on Hadith While t...
Read more
The Line of Prophets – A Continuation of the Message Isa (Jesus) – The Honored Messiah and Servant of Allah In the Islamic tradition, few prophets occupy as revered and central a place as ʿĪsā ibn Maryam (Jesus, son of Mary) . He is one of the five Ulū al-ʿAzm — the elite messengers distinguished for their endurance and unwavering resolve — along with Nūḥ, Ibrāhīm, Mūsā, and Muḥammad (peace be upon them all). His life, miracles, and eschatological role are discussed across over ninety verses in fifteen different surahs of the Qur’an, and he is referred to by name twenty-five times. Islam presents ʿĪsā not as divine, nor as the Son of God, but as a messenger of Allah , a spirit from Him (rūḥ minhu) , and His word cast upon Mary (kalimatuhu alqāhā ilā Maryam) . He was sent specifically to Banī Isrāʾīl (the Children of Israel) to revive the message of pure tawḥīd (monotheism), to confirm the Torah, and to deliver the Injīl , a scripture filled with light and guidance. A Miraculo...
Read more
  Before Islam: Decoding the Earliest Sources on Muhammad’s Movement Islamic tradition paints a vivid picture: in 610 CE, Muhammad received divine revelations in a Meccan cave, birthing Islam—a fully formed monotheistic faith with scripture, rituals, and law. Yet, the earliest non-Muslim records—Syriac, Greek, and Armenian chronicles from the 7th century—tell a starkly different story. They mention no “Islam,” no “Qur’an,” and no prophet preaching a new creed. Instead, Muhammad’s followers appear as “Hagarenes,” “Ishmaelites,” or “Saracens”—vague monotheists or tribal raiders acting under divine sanction. This evidence challenges the claim of a coherent religion descending from heaven, suggesting a fluid insurgency later mythologized into divine revelation by Abbasid scholars. This post dives into these sources, their context, and their implications, testing Islam’s narrative against the Qur’an’s own standards—proof ( Surah 2:111 ) and consistency ( Surah 4:82 ). The Islamic Narrat...
Read more