Muhammad Is the Final Filter of Reality 

Islam’s God Can’t Speak Without His Prophet

Introduction: 

The Middleman Religion

Islam claims to be a direct relationship between the believer and God — no priesthood, no intermediaries, just you and Allah. That’s the marketing pitch. But reality tells a very different story.

In practice, you cannot access Allah, understand His words, obey His laws, or know His will without going through one man: Muhammad. He is the sole gatekeeper of revelation, interpretation, law, and morality. Not in a metaphorical sense — in a literal, operational one. Every part of Islamic life is filtered through him.

This makes Muhammad more than a prophet. He is the final filter of reality itself — the only valid lens through which God can be seen, heard, obeyed, or understood. Remove him, and Islam becomes nothing more than divine white noise: incoherent, inaccessible, and functionally useless.

1. The Qur’an Cannot Function Without Muhammad

Let’s begin with Islam’s central text — the Qur’an. It repeatedly claims to be clear, detailed, and sufficient.

“We have sent down to you a Book explaining everything.” — Qur’an 16:89
“This Qur’an is not to be doubted. It is a guidance for the righteous.” — Qur’an 2:2

But Muslims do not — and cannot — use the Qur’an alone. Why? Because without Muhammad’s sayings and actions, the Qur’an becomes a skeleton without flesh. Consider:

  • The number of daily prayers? Not in the Qur’an.

  • How to perform prayer? Not in the Qur’an.

  • How much zakat to pay? Not in the Qur’an.

  • How to perform Hajj? Only fragments — no details.

  • What counts as apostasy? Theft? Inheritance rules? Slavery? — Most are vague or absent.

Instead, Muslims rely on the Sunnah — Muhammad’s reported actions and teachings — to fill in these critical gaps. That means Allah’s message is insufficient without Muhammad’s behavior to complete it.

Let that sink in: God’s eternal word is unusable without a 7th-century Arabian warlord's interpretive example.

2. Obedience to Allah Is Meaningless Without Obedience to Muhammad

Over and over, the Qur’an equates obedience to Muhammad with obedience to God. This is not a theological abstraction — it’s a legal command.

“He who obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah.” — Qur’an 4:80
“Say: If you love Allah, follow me, and Allah will love you.” — Qur’an 3:31
“It is not for a believing man or woman to have any choice in their matter when Allah and His Messenger have decided it.” — Qur’an 33:36

Muhammad is not just a mouthpiece. His commands bind the believer’s will just as much as God’s commands — sometimes more.

This creates a religious system where your faithfulness to God is measured by your submission to Muhammad’s authority. It’s not enough to believe in God or even worship Him. You must accept Muhammad as the sole legitimate interface to that belief and worship.

This isn’t divine revelation. It’s theological gatekeeping.

3. Muhammad Controls Morality — By Example, Not Principle

In Islam, right and wrong are not discovered through conscience, logic, or reflection. They’re determined by whatever Muhammad said or did.

“Indeed in the Messenger of Allah you have a perfect example...” — Qur’an 33:21

This means Islamic ethics is entirely prophet-relative. What’s moral? Whatever Muhammad did. What’s immoral? Whatever he condemned.

  • Muhammad had sex with a 9-year-old (Sahih Bukhari 5133) → Therefore, child marriage is halal.

  • He owned and traded slaves → Therefore, slavery is acceptable.

  • He ordered assassinations of critics (e.g. Asma bint Marwan, Ka’b ibn al-Ashraf) → Therefore, extrajudicial killings are legitimate.

  • He married his adopted son’s wife → Therefore, that taboo is erased (Qur’an 33:37).

Islamic morality isn’t timeless. It’s not even rational. It’s just Muhammad’s historical conduct frozen into divine law. Question it, and you’re not just challenging his choices — you’re committing blasphemy.

4. Islamic Law Is Personal Loyalty to Muhammad, Not Impartial Justice

Shariah — Islamic law — is based not primarily on God’s words but on Muhammad’s personal judgments in 7th-century Arabia.

The four major sources of Islamic jurisprudence (usul al-fiqh) are:

  1. The Qur’an

  2. The Sunnah (Muhammad’s actions and sayings)

  3. Qiyas (analogical reasoning based on Muhammad’s rulings)

  4. Ijma (consensus — always traced back to Muhammad’s era)

In other words, three out of four are entirely Muhammad-dependent. There is no concept of natural rights, objective law, or conscience-driven justice. The law is just a projection of Muhammad’s will — made permanent by canonization.

Islamic jurisprudence isn't divine. It’s personal loyalty masquerading as law.

5. The Spiritual Connection to God Is Replaced by Ritual Submission to Muhammad’s Model

Islam preaches tawḥīd — the absolute unity and sovereignty of God. But how do you connect with this God?

  • Not through introspection.

  • Not through mystical experience.

  • Not through reasoned theology.

Instead, you connect to God by copying Muhammad. That means:

  • You pray like Muhammad prayed.

  • You dress like Muhammad dressed.

  • You grow your beard like Muhammad did.

  • You eat, sleep, and even defecate following Muhammad’s instructions.

This isn't spiritual elevation. It's ritual mimicry.

The Muslim does not pursue union with God. He pursues alignment with Muhammad — because that’s the only path that Islam authorizes.

6. Any Reality Outside Muhammad’s Model Is Invalid

If you attempt to step outside Muhammad’s example — even if your intention is to worship Allah sincerely — you’re a deviant.

This is why:

  • New ideas are bid‘ah (heretical innovations).

  • Spiritual practices outside the Sunnah are rejected, even if they increase devotion.

  • Moral reasoning that contradicts the Prophet’s example is invalidated, even if it’s obviously more ethical by modern standards.

Muhammad becomes the final epistemological authority. Nothing else is allowed — not conscience, not reason, not even the raw text of the Qur’an, if it contradicts the Prophet’s behavior.

He becomes the prism through which all reality — moral, legal, spiritual, and social — must be refracted.

7. Muhammad Replaces God As the Emotional and Political Center

Look at how Muslims react emotionally:

  • Criticize Allah? Some discomfort, maybe argument.

  • Criticize Muhammad? Fury, riots, death threats, and murder.

This is not an accident. Islam trains Muslims to love Muhammad more than their own families and lives:

“None of you will have faith until he loves me more than his father, his children, and all mankind.” — Sahih Bukhari 15

That’s not spirituality. That’s emotional blackmail woven into faith. It ensures that Muhammad is not just obeyed — he is worshipped in all but name.

Conclusion: Islam Doesn’t Just Go Through Muhammad — It Is Muhammad

Islam claims to be a direct path to God. But everything — from theology to morality to law to daily life — is filtered exclusively through Muhammad. The Qur’an, prayer, ethics, social norms, political structure — none of it functions without him.

He is the lens. The translator. The judge. The model. The infallible standard.

God does not speak without Muhammad’s mouth. God does not command without Muhammad’s example.

Islam, therefore, is not just the “submission to Allah.” It is submission to Allah as understood, embodied, and dictated by one man — permanently.

In truth, Islam is not divine revelation filtered through a prophet.
It is a prophet’s life, desires, and commands reverse-engineered into divine revelation.

Muhammad is not just the messenger. He is the message.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Problematic Elevation of Hadith Over the Qur’an: A Critical Polemic Response to “Why Do Islamic Scholars Sometimes Prioritize Hadith Over Qur’anic Verses?” Introduction: The Qur’an or the Hadith — Which Truly Commands Authority? Islamic scholarship claims the Qur’an is the ultimate, unaltered word of God. Yet, the very same scholars often insist that hadith—the human-recorded sayings and actions of Muhammad—sometimes override or clarify the Qur’an itself. This contradictory stance raises serious questions about textual integrity, theological consistency, and the real source of Islamic law and morality. If the Qur’an is “the Book about which there is no doubt” (Qur’an 2:2), why do we find thousands of rulings and laws being sourced primarily from hadith, often at the expense of clear Qur’anic principles? This post critically examines the logic, consequences, and hidden assumptions behind this practice. 1. The Qur’an’s Primacy Is Undermined by Overreliance on Hadith While t...
Read more
The Line of Prophets – A Continuation of the Message Isa (Jesus) – The Honored Messiah and Servant of Allah In the Islamic tradition, few prophets occupy as revered and central a place as ʿĪsā ibn Maryam (Jesus, son of Mary) . He is one of the five Ulū al-ʿAzm — the elite messengers distinguished for their endurance and unwavering resolve — along with Nūḥ, Ibrāhīm, Mūsā, and Muḥammad (peace be upon them all). His life, miracles, and eschatological role are discussed across over ninety verses in fifteen different surahs of the Qur’an, and he is referred to by name twenty-five times. Islam presents ʿĪsā not as divine, nor as the Son of God, but as a messenger of Allah , a spirit from Him (rūḥ minhu) , and His word cast upon Mary (kalimatuhu alqāhā ilā Maryam) . He was sent specifically to Banī Isrāʾīl (the Children of Israel) to revive the message of pure tawḥīd (monotheism), to confirm the Torah, and to deliver the Injīl , a scripture filled with light and guidance. A Miraculo...
Read more
  Before Islam: Decoding the Earliest Sources on Muhammad’s Movement Islamic tradition paints a vivid picture: in 610 CE, Muhammad received divine revelations in a Meccan cave, birthing Islam—a fully formed monotheistic faith with scripture, rituals, and law. Yet, the earliest non-Muslim records—Syriac, Greek, and Armenian chronicles from the 7th century—tell a starkly different story. They mention no “Islam,” no “Qur’an,” and no prophet preaching a new creed. Instead, Muhammad’s followers appear as “Hagarenes,” “Ishmaelites,” or “Saracens”—vague monotheists or tribal raiders acting under divine sanction. This evidence challenges the claim of a coherent religion descending from heaven, suggesting a fluid insurgency later mythologized into divine revelation by Abbasid scholars. This post dives into these sources, their context, and their implications, testing Islam’s narrative against the Qur’an’s own standards—proof ( Surah 2:111 ) and consistency ( Surah 4:82 ). The Islamic Narrat...
Read more