Conspiracy of Islam

Islam: The Most Successful Religious Conspiracy in History.

We’re here to expose it.

This blog isn’t about polite debate or interfaith pageantry.
It’s about peeling back the myth — and revealing what’s underneath.

Conspiracy of Islam is a truth-first, no-apologies project dedicated to exposing how Islam was constructed — not by divine revelation, but by human hands, political agendas, and imperial machinery.

This is not hate.
This is forensic analysis — where claims are interrogated, dogma is dissected, and Islam’s self-image is stripped down to its historical scaffolding.

🧩 What We’re Doing — and Why

Islam claims divine perfection.
Unchangeable. Unchallengeable. Uncorrupted.
But these are not just religious claims — they are political weapons, and they deserve scrutiny.

We don’t deal in Islamophobia. We deal in Islam-analysis.
That means cutting through centuries of myth-making, theological spin, and revisionist storytelling to expose the system’s original architecture.

We’re not here to attack Muslims.
We’re here to dismantle Islam’s ideology — brick by brick.

If your beliefs collapse under pressure, maybe they were never divine.
And if truth is sacred — it should fear no question.

❓Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Are you saying Islam was a conspiracy?

A: Not a “theory” — a demonstrable conspiracy. The Qur’an, hadith, and Islamic law were assembled over time to cement political dominance. This wasn’t spiritual revelation — it was imperial propaganda. The evidence isn’t hidden; it’s just ignored.

Q: Are you attacking Muslims? 

A: No. We critique ideas, not people. Many Muslims are intelligent, sincere, and compassionate. But the ideology they’ve inherited is historically manipulated, morally questionable, and systemically authoritarian..

Criticizing an idea is not hate — it’s honesty.

Q: Why focus on Islam specifically?

A: Because Islam isn’t just a religion — it’s a totalizing system.
It claims finality, infallibility, and universal supremacy.
It demands obedience not just spiritually, but politically, socially, and legally.
If it wants global authority, it deserves global accountability.

Q: Aren’t you just cherry-picking hadith or ignoring contex?

A: No. Islam cherry-picked first.
Hadith were compiled centuries later, and many were fabricated to serve political needs.
“Context” was often invented to defuse disturbing verses.
We do the opposite: we restore real context, expose contradictions, and follow the evidence wherever it leads.

Q: What are your sources?

A: We use Islam’s own materials — and show how they unravel under scrutiny:

  • The Qur’an

  • Canonical Hadith Collections

  • Early Islamic Historians (e.g., Ibn Ishaq, al-Tabari)

  • Classical Hadith Critics (e.g., al-Daraqutni, Ibn Abi Hatim)

  • Tafsir Literature (e.g., al-Jalalayn, al-Qurtubi)

  • Modern Critical Scholarship, Archaeology, and Revisionist Historiography

This isn’t speculation — this is source-driven analysis.

Q: What’s your end goal?

A: To break the illusion.
To expose that Islam is not divinely revealed, not internally consistent, and not morally superior.
To arm readers — Muslims, ex-Muslims, skeptics, and curious minds — with the intellectual ammunition needed to challenge the myth.

Q: Why the name “Conspiracy of Islam”? Isn’t that provocative?

A: It’s meant to be.
Because Islam as we know it is not the untouched word of God — it is the product of coordination, revisionism, and empire-building.
That’s not a “wild theory.” That’s a conspiracy in the classical sense: a deliberate effort to shape belief for power.

🎯 The Mission Remains

This isn’t about rage.
This isn’t about revenge.
This is about revealing what the textbooks won’t, and what the pulpits won’t dare say.

So if you’re ready to question everything Islam claims to be —
You’re exactly where you need to be.

conspiracyofislam@blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Problematic Elevation of Hadith Over the Qur’an: A Critical Polemic Response to “Why Do Islamic Scholars Sometimes Prioritize Hadith Over Qur’anic Verses?” Introduction: The Qur’an or the Hadith — Which Truly Commands Authority? Islamic scholarship claims the Qur’an is the ultimate, unaltered word of God. Yet, the very same scholars often insist that hadith—the human-recorded sayings and actions of Muhammad—sometimes override or clarify the Qur’an itself. This contradictory stance raises serious questions about textual integrity, theological consistency, and the real source of Islamic law and morality. If the Qur’an is “the Book about which there is no doubt” (Qur’an 2:2), why do we find thousands of rulings and laws being sourced primarily from hadith, often at the expense of clear Qur’anic principles? This post critically examines the logic, consequences, and hidden assumptions behind this practice. 1. The Qur’an’s Primacy Is Undermined by Overreliance on Hadith While t...
Read more
The Line of Prophets – A Continuation of the Message Isa (Jesus) – The Honored Messiah and Servant of Allah In the Islamic tradition, few prophets occupy as revered and central a place as ʿĪsā ibn Maryam (Jesus, son of Mary) . He is one of the five Ulū al-ʿAzm — the elite messengers distinguished for their endurance and unwavering resolve — along with Nūḥ, Ibrāhīm, Mūsā, and Muḥammad (peace be upon them all). His life, miracles, and eschatological role are discussed across over ninety verses in fifteen different surahs of the Qur’an, and he is referred to by name twenty-five times. Islam presents ʿĪsā not as divine, nor as the Son of God, but as a messenger of Allah , a spirit from Him (rūḥ minhu) , and His word cast upon Mary (kalimatuhu alqāhā ilā Maryam) . He was sent specifically to Banī Isrāʾīl (the Children of Israel) to revive the message of pure tawḥīd (monotheism), to confirm the Torah, and to deliver the Injīl , a scripture filled with light and guidance. A Miraculo...
Read more
  Before Islam: Decoding the Earliest Sources on Muhammad’s Movement Islamic tradition paints a vivid picture: in 610 CE, Muhammad received divine revelations in a Meccan cave, birthing Islam—a fully formed monotheistic faith with scripture, rituals, and law. Yet, the earliest non-Muslim records—Syriac, Greek, and Armenian chronicles from the 7th century—tell a starkly different story. They mention no “Islam,” no “Qur’an,” and no prophet preaching a new creed. Instead, Muhammad’s followers appear as “Hagarenes,” “Ishmaelites,” or “Saracens”—vague monotheists or tribal raiders acting under divine sanction. This evidence challenges the claim of a coherent religion descending from heaven, suggesting a fluid insurgency later mythologized into divine revelation by Abbasid scholars. This post dives into these sources, their context, and their implications, testing Islam’s narrative against the Qur’an’s own standards—proof ( Surah 2:111 ) and consistency ( Surah 4:82 ). The Islamic Narrat...
Read more